本文已被:浏览 23次 下载 36次
投稿时间:2025-10-26 网络发布日期:2026-04-02
投稿时间:2025-10-26 网络发布日期:2026-04-02
中文摘要: 目的观察冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)在直径5~10 mm结直肠扁平息肉老年患者临床治疗中的应用及疗效。方法选取2023年8 月至2025 年4月南京江北医院和南京医科大学第四附属医院消化科收治的肠镜下发现直径5~10 mm结直肠扁平息肉的老年患者,采用随机数表法分为三组:CSP组、热圈套息肉切除术(HSP)组和HSP +黏膜下注射组(联合组),每组各40例。比较三组患者的一般资料、息肉切除时间、一次性完整切除率、术后1年复发率、术中出血/穿孔及术后迟发性出血/穿孔发生率。结果三组患者在一般资料、一次在完整切除率、1 年后复发率、术中出血及总体并发症方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。联合组息肉切除时间为(4.01±0.82)min,CSP组为(2.04±0.53)min,HSP组为(2.17±0.43)min,三组息肉切除时间差异有统计学意义(F=129.405,P<0.01)。联合组息肉切除时间分别长于CSP组和HSP组(P<0.05),而CSP组与HSP组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组术中并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。CSP组、HSP组、联合组术后迟发性出血分别为0、2、5例,术后迟发性穿孔分别为0、0、1例,CSP组、HSP组、联合组术后并发症总发生率差异有统计学意义[0 vs 5.0% vs 15.0%,χ2=7.500,P=0.024]。结论CSP在治疗老年患者5~10 mm扁平结直肠息肉方面安全有效,与HSP效果相当,方法简单、治疗时间短,且不易发生术后迟发性出血。
Abstract:Objective To observe the application and efficacy of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in the clinical treatment of 5-10 mm flat colorectal polyps in elderly patients. Methods Elderly patients with flat colorectal polyps measuring 5-10 mm in diameter, detected through colonoscopy and admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology at Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital and the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from August 2023 to April 2025, were selected. They were randomly divided into three groups using a random number table: the CSP group, the hot snare polypectomy (HSP) group, and the HSP with submucosal injection group (combined group), with 40 cases in each group. The general data, polyp resection time, one-time complete resection rate, 1-year recurrence rate, as well as incidence intraoperative bleeding / perforation and delayed postoperative bleeding / perforation were compared among the three groups. Results There was no statistically significant difference in general data, complete resection rate, recurrence rate after one year, intraoperative bleeding and overall complications among the three groups (P> 0.05). The polyp removal time for the combined group was (4.01±0.82) min, for the CSP group was (2.04±0.53) min, and for the HSP group was (2.17 ± 0.43) min. The difference in polyp removal time among the three groups was statistically significant (F=129.405, P<0.01). The polyp removal time of the combined group was longer than that of the CSP group and the HSP group (P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference between the CSP group and the HSP group (P>0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of intraoperative complications among the three groups (P>0.05). Delayed postoperative bleeding occurred in 0, 2, and 5 cases in the CSP group, HSP group, and combined group, respectively, and delayed postoperative perforation occurred in 0, 0, and 1 case, respectively. The difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications among the CSP group, HSP group, and combined group was statistically significant [0 vs 5.0% vs 15.0%, χ2=7.500, P=0.024]. Conclusion CSP is safe and effective in treating 5-10 mm flat colorectal polyps in elderly patients, with results comparable to HSP.
keywords: Colorectal polyps Cold snare polypectomy Hot snare polypectomy Submucosal injection Safety
文章编号: 中图分类号:R574.6 文献标志码:A
基金项目:皖南医学院科研项目(JXYY202253)
附件
引用文本:
黄晓丽,刘舒予,潘英,等.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗老年患者直径5~10 mm结直肠扁平息肉[J].中国临床研究,2026,39(3):434-437,442.
黄晓丽,刘舒予,潘英,等.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗老年患者直径5~10 mm结直肠扁平息肉[J].中国临床研究,2026,39(3):434-437,442.
