###
中国临床研究:2025,38(10):1484-1489
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
环泊酚与丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉在老年腹腔镜结肠癌根治术中的麻醉质量及术后恢复质量比较
(苏州大学附属张家港医院 张家港市第一人民医院麻醉科, 江苏 苏州 215600)
Comparison of anesthesia quality and postoperative recovery quality of total intravenous anesthesia with ciprofol and propofol in laparoscopic radical resection of elderly patients
(Department of Anesthesiology,Zhangjiagang Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University,The First People's Hospital of Zhangjiagang,Suzhou,Jiangsu 215600,China)
摘要
本文已被:浏览 414次   下载 344
投稿时间:2025-04-30   网络发布日期:2025-10-20
中文摘要: 目的 比较环泊酚与丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉在老年腹腔镜结肠癌根治术中的麻醉质量及术后恢复质量,为临床麻醉药物的优化选择提供依据。方法 前瞻性纳入2023年1月至2025年1月拟于张家港市第一人民医院 行腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的老年患者156例。依照随机数字表分为环泊酚组(C组)或丙泊酚组(P组),每组纳入 78例患者。麻醉维持给予C组泵注环泊酚0.4~3 mg/(kg·h)及瑞芬太尼0.05~2 μg/(kg·min),P组泵注丙泊酚4~ 12 mg/(kg·h)及瑞芬太尼0.05~2 μg/(kg·min),并根据需要间断静脉注射罗库溴铵维持肌松效果。记录术中平均 动脉压(MAP)、心率。于麻醉复苏室(PACU)内评估Richmond躁动-镇静量表(RASS)评分。记录患者麻醉诱导 时间、拔管时间、PACU停留时间。观察术中不良事件(注射痛、术中低血压、高血压、心动过缓和心动过速)和PA- CU内不良反应发生率。使用术后15项恢复质量量表(Qor-15)评估患者术后恢复质量。结果 P组患者气管插 管后即刻MAP显著低于C组患者(P<0.05)。两组患者拔管后RASS评分以及两组患者麻醉诱导时间、拔管时 间、PACU停留时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。注射痛无、轻、中、重在P组分别为17、33、19、9例,在 C组分别为67、5、5、1例,P组注射痛程度显著高于C组(Z=7.544,P <0.01);术中低血压发生率P组显著高于C 组(51.3% vs 26.9%,χ2 =9.718,P<0.01)。两组患者 PACU 内不良反应发生率以及两组患者术后 1 d、2 d、3 d Qor-15比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 在老年腹腔镜结肠癌根治术中,使用环泊酚或丙泊酚进行 全凭静脉麻醉均可实现良好的麻醉效果与术后恢复质量。与丙泊酚相比,环泊酚在维持血流动力学稳定性方 面具有一定优势且注射痛更加轻微。因此,环泊酚可作为老年结肠癌患者腹腔镜手术中一种安全、有效的麻醉 选择。
Abstract:Objective To compare the anesthesia quality and postoperative recovery quality between ciprofol and propofol for total intravenous anesthesia in elderly patients with colon cancer undergoing laparoscopic radical resection,and to provide evidences for optimizing clinical anesthesia selection. Methods A total of 156 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer in the First People’s Hospital of Zhangjiagang from January 2023to January 2025 were prospectively included. According to the random number table method,they were divided into ciprofol group(group C)and propofol group(group P),with 78 patients in each group. Anesthesia was maintained by pumping ciprofol 0.4-3 mg/(kg·h)and remifentanil 0.05-2 μg/(kg·min)in group C,and propofol 4-12 mg/(kg·h)and remifentanil 0.05- 2 μg/(kg·min)in group P,and intermittent intravenous injection of rocuronium as needed to maintain the muscle relaxation effect. Intraoperative mean arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate(HR)were recorded.Richmond agitation-sedation scale(RASS)scores were assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit(PACU). Anesthesia induction time,extubation time,and PACU stay were recorded. Intraoperative adverse events,including injection pain,hypotension,hypertension,bradycardia,and tachycardia,were observed,as well as adverse events in the PACU. The 15-item quality of recovery scale(Qor-15)was used to evaluate postoperative recovery. Results Instant MAP at the time of endotracheal intubation was significantly lower in group P compared to group C(P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in RASS scores after extubation,as well as anesthesia induction time,extubation time,or PACU stay between the two groups(P>0.05). The non-,mild-,moderate- and severe-injection pain were 17,33,19 and 9 cases in group P,and 67,5,5 and 1 case in group C,respectively. The degree of injection pain in group P was significantly higher than that in group C (Z=7.544,P<0.01). The incidence of intraoperative hypotension in group P was significantly higher than that in group C(51.3% vs 26.9%,χ2=9.718,P=0.002). No significant difference was found in the incidence of adverse events in the PACU,and postoperative Qor-15 scores on postoperative days 1,2,and 3between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion In laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer in the elderly patients,total intravenous anesthesia with ciprofol or propofol can achieve good anesthesia effects and postoperative recovery quality. Compared with propofol,ciprofol has certain advantages in maintaining hemodynamic stability and the injection pain is more mild. Therefore,ciprofol can be used as a safe and effective anesthesia choice in laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with colon cancer.
文章编号:     中图分类号:R614.2+4    文献标志码:A
基金项目:江苏省高层次卫生人才“六个一工程”拔尖人才科研项目(LGY202327);张家港市卫生青年科技项目(ZJGQNKJ202405);张家港市科技计划项目(ZKYL2314)
附件
引用文本:
戴家豪, 姬婷婷, 赵雯洁, 徐振华.环泊酚与丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉在老年腹腔镜结肠癌根治术中的麻醉质量及术后恢复质量比较[J].中国临床研究,2025,38(10):1484-1489.

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫