本文已被:浏览 45次 下载 59次
Received:October 15, 2025 Published Online:July 30, 2026
Received:October 15, 2025 Published Online:July 30, 2026
中文摘要: 目的 比较基于阿片类药物应用的不同麻醉策略对行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后疼痛及围手术期血流动力学的影响。方法 随机选取2025年2月至9月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院东城院区接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者117 例,按随机数字表法分为无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)组、阿片类药物节俭麻醉(OSA)组和阿片类药物麻醉(OBA)组,各39 例。在患者入室时(T0)、麻醉诱导后(T1)、喉罩插管后1 min(T2)和建立气腹后1 min(T3)记录平均动脉压(MAP)及心率。依据MAP数据计算血压变异性(BPV)、变异系数(CV)和平均真实变异性(ARV)。于返回病房后30 min、1 h、2 h、6 h使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估患者的疼痛程度。记录麻醉复苏室(PACU)停留时间、术后24 h内的补救镇痛人数、首次排气时间及术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生情况。结果 OFA组和OSA组各有1例患者退出研究,最终OFA组38例、OSA组38例、OBA组39例纳入研究。OBA组患者T1~T3时点心率明显低于OFA 组(P<0.05),OSA 组患者T2 时点心率明显低于OFA 组(P<0.05)。OBA 组患者T1~T3 时点MAP明显低于OFA组和OSA组(P<0.05)。BPVMAP、CVMAP、ARVMAP均呈OBA组>OFA组>OSA组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。OBA组患者返回病房后1 h、2 h、6 h VAS明显高于OFA组和OSA组(P<0.05)。OSA组、OFA组、OBA组患者补救镇痛率分别为23.7%、31.6%和53.8%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.151,P=0.017)。患者首次排气时间依OFA组、OSA组、OBA组之序逐渐延长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 OSA不仅可有效缓解腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的术后疼痛,还可维持术中血流动力学稳定,且对术后胃肠功能恢复无明显延迟作用。
Abstract:Objective To compare the influences of different opioid-associated anesthesia regimens on postoperative pain and perioperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods A total of 117 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Dongcheng Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from February to September 2025 were randomly selected,and divided into three groups according to the random number table method:opioid-free anesthesia(OFA)group,opioid-sparing anesthesia(OSA)group and opioid - based anesthesia(OBA)group(39 cases each). Mean arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate(HR)were recorded at the time of entering the operating room(T0),after anesthesia induction(T1),1 min after laryngeal mask intubation(T2)and 1 min after pneumoperitoneum establishment(T3). Blood pressure variability(BPV),coefficient of variation(CV)and average real variability(ARV)were calculated from MAP data. Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)was used to evaluate the degree of pain at 30 min,1 h,2 h and 6 h after returning to the ward. The PACU stay,rescue analgesics required within 24 h after surgery,the time to first flatus,and the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting(PONV)were recorded. Results One case withdrew from the OFA group and one from the OSA group, finally 38,38 and 39 cases in OFA group, OSA group, and OBA group were included in the study. Patients in the OBA group had significantly lower HR at T1-T3 compared with the OFA group(P<0.05),while patients in the OSA group had significantly lower HR at T2 compared with the OFA group(P<0.05). MAP at T1-T3 in the OBA group was significantly lower than that in both the OFA and OSA groups(P<0.05). The BPVMAP,CVMAP,and ARVMAP all followed the order OBA group>OFA group>OSA group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). The VAS scores of patients in the OBA group were significantly higher than those of patients in the OFA group and OSA group at 1 h,2 h,and 6 h after returning to the ward(P<0.05). The rescue analgesia rates for patients in the OSA group,OFA group,and OBA group were 23.7%,31.6% and 53.8%,respectively,with statistically significant differences among the three groups(χ2=8.151,P=0.017). The time to first flatus in patients gradually increased in the order of the OFA group,OSA group,and OBA group,with the difference being statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion OSA can not only provide effective postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy,but also maintain intraoperative hemodynamic stability without significantly delaying postoperative gastrointestinal recovery.
keywords: Opioid-sparing anesthesia Opioid-free anaesthesia Mean arterial pressure Blood pressure variability Coefficient of variation Average real variability Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
文章编号: 中图分类号:R614.2 文献标志码:A
基金项目:安徽省卫生健康科研项目(AHWJ2022b031)
引用文本:
