本文已被:浏览 159次 下载 151次
Received:January 05, 2026 Published Online:June 28, 2026
Received:January 05, 2026 Published Online:June 28, 2026
中文摘要: 目的 观察芪苓护肾方对2型糖尿病肾病(T2DKD)湿瘀阻络证患者蛋白尿和肾功能损伤的临床疗效及安全性。方法 选取2022年8月至2025年8月江苏省中医院内分泌科收治的T2DKD患者380例,根据是否服用芪苓护肾方分为中药组与对照组,每组190例。对照组给予单纯西医基础治疗,中药组在对照组基础上给予芪苓护肾方,两组疗程均为12周。观察两组T2DKD患者治疗前后尿白蛋白/肌酐比值(UACR)、估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、糖脂代谢指标[包括空腹血糖(FBG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)]和中医证候总积分的变化情况,并统计不良反应发生情况。结果 在临床研究期间中药组患者脱落与剔除25例,165例完成试验;对照组脱落与剔除26例,164例完成试验。两组T2DKD患者治疗后UACR水平较治疗前均有明显下降(P<0.05),中药组下降幅度显著优于对照组(P<0.01)。对照组A2期患者治疗前后UACR差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而中药组A2期患者治疗后UACR较治疗前显著下降(P<0.01)。两组A3期患者治疗后UACR均较治疗前明显下降(P<0.05),但中药组下降幅度显著优于对照组(P<0.01)。对照组和中药组eGFR在治疗前后比较及组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组治疗后HbA1C较治疗前均下降(P<0.05),中药组治疗后TC、LDL-C较治疗前下降(P<0.05),但组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组中医证候总积分治疗后较治疗前均有下降(P<0.05),且治疗后中药组显著低于对照组(11.6±3.6vs17.2±6.2,t=9.991,P<0.01)。中药组和对照组的不良反应总发生率分别为5.45%(9/165)和3.05%(5/164),两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.168,P=0.280)。结论 与单纯西医基础治疗相比,芪苓护肾方联合西医基础治疗可以显著降低T2DKD患者UACR,且安全性良好。
Abstract:Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of Qiling HushenFormula on proteinuria and renal function in patients with type 2 diabetic kidney disease(T2DKD)of dampness-stasis obstructing collaterals syndrome. Methods A total of 380 T2DKD patients admitted to the Department of Endocrinology, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine from August 2022 to August 2025 were enrolled. They were divided into the Chinese medicine group and the control group according to whether Qiling Hushen Formula was taken, with 190 cases in each group. The control group was given simple basic western medicine treatment, while the Chinese medicine group was given Qiling Hushen Formula on the basis of control group. The course of treatment for both groups was 12 weeks. Changes in urinary albumin-to -creatinine ratio(UACR), estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR), glucose and lipid metabolism indicators including fasting blood glucose(FBG), glycosylated hemoglobin(HbA1C), total cholesterol(TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL - C)and total score of Chinese medicine syndromes were observed in the two groups of T2DKDpatients before and after treatment, and the occurrence of adverse event reactions and conduct statistics were recorded. Results During the clinical study, 25 patients in the Chinese medicine group dropped out or were excluded and 165cases completed the trial. In the control group, 26 patients dropped out or were excluded and 164 cases completed the trial. After treatment, the UACR level of T2DKD patients in both groups was significantly lower than that before treatment(P<0.05), and the decreasing range in the Chinese medicine group was significantly better than that in the control group(P<0.01). There was no significant difference in UACR of patients in stage A2 of the control group before and after treatment(P>0.05), while the UACR of patients in stage A2 of the Chinese medicine group was significantly decreased after treatment compared to before treatment(P<0.01). After treatment, the UACR of patients in stage A3 of both groups was significantly lower than that before treatment(P<0.05), and the decreasing range in the Chinese medicine group was still significantly better than that in the control group(P<0.01). According to the subgroup analysis of eGFR level by GA stage, there was no significant difference in eGFR between before and after treatment and between the two groups in both the control group and the Chinese medicine group(P>0.05). After treatment, HbA1C in both groups was lower than that before treatment(P<0.05);TC and LDL-C in the Chinese medicine group after treatment were lower than those before treatment(P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). The total score of Chinese medicine syndromes in both groups decreased after treatment, and the total score in the Chinese medicine group was significantly lower than that in the control group(11.6±3.6 vs 17.2±6.2, t=9.991, P<0.01).The total incidence of adverse reactions was 5.45%(9/165)in the Chinese medicine group and 3.05%(5/164)in the control group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(χ2=1.168, P=0.280).Conclusion Compared with simple basic western medicine treatment, Qiling Hushen Formula combined with basic western medicine treatment was confirmed to significantly reduce the UACR level proteinuria of T2DKD patients and effectively improve clinical symptoms with good safety.
keywords: Type 2 diabetes mellitus Diabetic kidney disease Qiling Hushen Formula Proteinuria Urinary albumin- to-creatinine ratio Estimated glomerular filtration rate
文章编号: 中图分类号:R587.1 文献标志码:A
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(82374386)
引用文本:
