本文已被:浏览 18次 下载 4次
Received:December 11, 2024 Published Online:May 22, 2026
Received:December 11, 2024 Published Online:May 22, 2026
中文摘要: 目的 系统评估四种营养评估工具对住院2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者低血糖风险的预测效能,探索营养不良与低血糖的关联,并构建低血糖风险预测模型。方法 回顾性纳入2014年1月至2023年12月在青岛大学附属医院住院的3 864例T2DM患者,根据入院时空腹血糖(FPG)水平分组:FPG≤3.9 mmol/L者定义为低血糖组(1 273例),FPG4.0~6.0 mmol/L 的患者定义为血糖平稳组(2 591 例),采用预后营养指数(PNI)、营养风险指数(NRI)、控制营养状态(CONUT)评分及营养风险筛查量表2002(NRS2002)四种营养评估工具进行营养状态判定,比较各工具预测低血糖的能力。使用LASSO回归筛选特征变量,建立多因素logistic回归模型,绘制列线图,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线与Bootstrap方法评估模型预测性能。结果 ROC曲线分析显示,四种营养工具中,NRS2002具有最优的低血糖预测能力[曲线下面积(AUC)=0.697,灵敏度49.10%,特异度90.04%],NRI、PNI、CONUT的AUC分别为0.612、0.590、0.587,整体营养工具预测效能尚有限。多因素logistic 回归分析显示,NRS2002评估出的营养不良患者发生低血糖风险的OR值最大,为2.68(95%CI:2.39~3.01)。PNI、NRI经LASSO回归变量筛选后最终未纳入多因素 logistic 回归模型,提示其适用性有限。最终构建的回归方程如下:logit(P)=-1.418+0.842×NRS2002+0.343×病程+0.233×用药仅口服降糖药+1.778×用药仅胰岛素+1.839×用药口服药联合胰岛素-0.662×冠心病病史-0.441×前白蛋白-0.229×估算肾小球滤过率。该模型预测T2DM患者发生低血糖的能力较好,ROC曲线的AUC为0.846,灵敏度为77.5%,特异度为80.1%。结论 营养不良与低血糖独立相关。列线图模型预测效能优于常用营养工具,具有良好的临床实用性,为临床营养风险筛查工具在血糖管理中的融合应用提供新思路。
Abstract:Objective To systematically evaluate the predictive efficacy of four nutritional assessment tools for hypoglycemia risk in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM),explore the independent association between malnutrition and hypoglycemia,and construct a hypoglycemia risk prediction model. Methods A total of 3 864 T2DM patients hospitalized in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2014 to December 2023 were retrospectively enrolled and grouped according to fasting plasma glucose(FPG)levels at admission:patients with FPG ≤ 3.9 mmol/L were defined as the hypoglycemia group(n=1 273),and those with FPG between 4.0 and 6.0 mmol/L were defined as the euglycemia group(n=2 591). Four nutritional assessment tools,including Prognostic Nutritional Index(PNI),Nutritional Risk Index(NRI),Controlling Nutritional Status(CONUT)score,and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002(NRS2002),were used to determine nutritional status,and their predictive abilities for hypoglycemia were compared. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator(LASSO)regression was applied to screen characteristic variables,a multivariate logistic regression model was established,a nomogram was drawn,and the predictive performance of the model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve and Bootstrap method. Results ROC curve analysis showed that among the four nutritional tools,NRS2002 had the optimal predictive ability for hypoglycemia[area under the curve(AUC)=0.697,sensitivity=49.10%,specificity=90.04%],while the AUC values of NRI,PNI,and CONUT were 0.612,0.590,and 0.587,respectively,indicating limited overall predictive efficacy of nutritional tools. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that malnutrition assessed by NRS2002 had the largest odds ratio(OR)for hypoglycemia risk,at 2.68(95%CI:2.39-3.01). PNI and NRI were not included in the final multivariate logistic regression model after LASSO regression variable screening,suggesting their limited applicability in this population. The final constructed regression equation was as follows:logit(P)=- 1.418 + 0.842 ×NRS2002 + 0.343 × disease duration + 0.233 × oral hypoglycemic agents alone + 1.778 × insulin monotherapy + 1.839 ×combined oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin- 0.662 × history of coronary heart disease- 0.441 × prealbumin- 0.229 ×estimated glomerular filtration rate. The model exhibited good ability to predict hypoglycemia occurrence in T2DM,with an AUC of 0.846 on the ROC curve;a sensitivity of 77.5% and a specificity of 80.1% . Conclusion Malnutrition is independently associated with hypoglycemia in hospitalized T2DM patients. The nomogram model has better predictive efficacy than commonly used nutritional tools and good clinical practicability,providing new ideas for the integrated application of clinical nutritional risk screening tools in blood glucose management.
keywords: Type 2 diabetes mellitus Nutritional assessment tools Malnutrition Hypoglycemia Prognostic Nutritional Index Nutritional Risk Index Controlling Nutritional Status Nutritional Risk Screening 2002
文章编号: 中图分类号:R587.1 文献标志码:A
基金项目:
| Author Name | Affiliation |
| ZHOU Wenhui,CHEN Tong,GENG Fanqi,WANG Yan,ZHANG Jietao | Department of General Practice,The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University,Qingdao,Shandong 266000,China |
| Author Name | Affiliation |
| ZHOU Wenhui,CHEN Tong,GENG Fanqi,WANG Yan,ZHANG Jietao | Department of General Practice,The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University,Qingdao,Shandong 266000,China |
引用文本:
