本文已被:浏览 39次 下载 37次
投稿时间:2025-12-08 网络发布日期:2026-04-02
投稿时间:2025-12-08 网络发布日期:2026-04-02
中文摘要: 目的比较超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)平面内与平面外入路对胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者术后镇痛效果的差异。方法采用随机对照试验设计,纳入2025年1月至8月于山东大学齐鲁第二医院择期行胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者102例,随机分为平面内组(IP组,n=51)与平面外组(OOP组,n=51)。所有患者于术前在麻醉准备间接受超声引导下单次TPVB。主要观察指标为术后6 h咳嗽时视觉模拟评分(VAS)。次要指标包括术后1、2、12、24 h的咳嗽VAS评分、术后24 h VAS的曲线下面积(AUC)阻滞操作时间、进针深度、阻滞起效与固定时间、阻滞平面范围、术中阿片类药物消耗量、患者满意度及不良反应。采用多元线性回归分析术后24 h VAS-AUC的影响因素。结果两组患者在术后各时点VAS评分、24 h VAS-AUC、术中阿片类药物用量、患者满意度及术中不良反应发生率上差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与IP组比较,OOP组有更短的操作时间[194.00(181.00,217.00)s vs227.00(201.00,259.50)s,Z=4.803,P<0.01]和更浅的进针深度[2.80(2.30, 3.40)cm vs 3.50(3.00,4.00)m,Z=4.854,P<0.01]。多元线性回归分析显示,阻滞平面范围、阻滞起效时间及年龄是术后疼痛的独立影响因素(P<0.05)。结论对于胸腔镜肺叶切除术,超声引导TPVB采用平面外入路可提供与平面内入路相近的术后镇痛效果,且具有操作更便捷、进针更浅的优势。而阻滞范围、阻滞起效时间及患者年龄是影响平面外入路TPVB镇痛效果的关键因素。
Abstract:Objective To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the in-plane versus out-of-plane approach for ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy. Methods A total of 102 patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic lobectomy at Qilu Second Hospital of Shandong University from January to August 2025 were enrolled and randomly divided into an in-plane group (IP group, n=51) and an out-of-plane group (OOP group, n=51). All patients received a single-shot ultrasound-guided TPVB in the anesthesia preparation room before surgery. The primary outcome measure was the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at 6 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included cough VAS scores at 1, 2, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively, area under the curve (AUC) of VAS 24 hours postoperatively block performance time, needling depth, block onset and fixation time, extent of sensory block, intraoperative opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, and adverse reactions. Multivariate linear regression was used to analyze factors influencing the VAS-AUC at 24 hours postoperatively. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in VAS scores at various postoperative time points, 24-hour VAS-AUC, intraoperative opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, or incidence of intraoperative adverse reactions (P> 0.05). Compared with the IP group, the OOP group had a significantly shorter block performance time[194.00 (181.00, 217.00) s vs 227.00 (201.00, 259.50) s, Z=4.803, P<0.01]and shallower needling depth[2.80 (2.30, 3.40) cm vs 3.50 (3.00, 4.00) m, Z=4.854, P<0.01]. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that sensory block extent, block onset time, and age were independent influencing factors of postoperative pain (P<0.05). Conclusion For thoracoscopic lobectomy, the out-of-plane approach for ultrasound-guided TPVB provides comparable postoperative analgesia to the in-plane approach, while offering the advantages of being more convenient to perform and requiring a shallower needling depth. The extent of sensory block, onset time block, and patient age are key factors influencing the analgesic efficacy of the out-of-plane TPVB approach.
keywords: Ultrasound-guided Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery Thoracic paravertebral block Postoperative analgesia In-plane approach Out-of-plane approach
文章编号: 中图分类号:R541.7 文献标志码:A
基金项目:
附件
| 作者 | 单位 |
| 李以晴 | 山东大学齐鲁第二医院麻醉科, 山东 济南 250033 |
| 韩颖 | 山东大学齐鲁第二医院麻醉科, 山东 济南 250033 |
| 冯昌 | 山东大学齐鲁第二医院麻醉科, 山东 济南 250033 |
| 赵鑫 | 山东大学齐鲁第二医院麻醉科, 山东 济南 250033 |
引用文本:
李以晴,韩颖,冯昌,等.两点法不同入路胸椎旁神经阻滞的镇痛效果[J].中国临床研究,2026,39(3):337-341.
李以晴,韩颖,冯昌,等.两点法不同入路胸椎旁神经阻滞的镇痛效果[J].中国临床研究,2026,39(3):337-341.
