本文已被:浏览 143次 下载 70次
投稿时间:2024-04-24 网络发布日期:2025-12-25
投稿时间:2024-04-24 网络发布日期:2025-12-25
中文摘要: 目的 探讨血清胰岛素样生长因子-1(IGF-1)、胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白-7(IGFBP-7)、高迁移率族蛋白(HMG)A2和HMGB1水平在评估微波消融联合吉西他滨+顺铂(GP)化疗治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)晚期患者预后中的价值。方法 选取2020年1月至2024年12月在沧州市人民医院接受化疗的NSCLC晚期患者82例为肺癌组,另外选取同期健康体检的健康者70例为对照组。肺癌组患者接受微波消融联合GP化疗。比较肺癌组治疗前后和对照组血清IGF-1、IGFBP-7、HMGA2、HMGB1水平。根据预后情况将肺癌组患者分为预后良好组和预后不良组,对影响预后的因素进行多因素logistic回归分析,采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析血清IGF-1、IGFBP-7、HMGA2、HMGB1对微波消融联合GP化疗预后的预测价值。结果 肺癌组治疗前IGF-1、HMGA2和HMGB1水平高于对照组,IGFBP-7水平低于对照组(P<0.05)。与治疗前相比,肺癌组治疗后IGF-1、HMGB1及HMGA2水平降低,IGFBP-7水平升高(P<0.05)。微波消融联合GP化疗后预后良好的患者58例,预后不良患者24例。与预后不良组相比,预后良好组患者的血清IGF-1[(336.86±8.46)μg/Lvs(362.04±8.04)μg/L,t=12.437,P<0.01]、HMGB1[(2.34±0.21)ng/mL vs(3.04±0.43)ng/mL,t=7.608,P<0.01]及HMGA2[(1.56±0.13)ng/L vs(2.38±0.98)ng/L,t=4.084,P<0.01]水平较低,血清IGFBP-7较高[(36.82±3.77)ng/L vs(25.37±4.15)ng/L,t=12.149,P<0.01]。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,血清IGF-1、HMGA2、HMGB1水平高,IGFBP-7水平低是微波消融联合GP化疗预后的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,血清IGF-1、IGFBP-7、HMGA2、HMGB1预测微波消融联合GP化疗预后的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.883、0.801、0.865、0.875,联合检测的AUC最大,为0.974。结论 血清IGF-1、IGFBP-7、HMGA2和HMGB1水平可作为微波消融联合GP化疗治疗NSCLC晚期患者预后评估的有效生物标志物。
Abstract:Objective To investigate the value of serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7 (IGFBP-7), high mobility group protein (HMG) A2, and HMGB1 in evaluating the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with microwave ablation combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy. Methods A total of 82 patients with advanced NSCLC who received chemotherapy at CangZhou People's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2024 were selected as the lung cancer group, and 70 healthy individuals who underwent health examinations during the same period were selected as the control group. Patients in the lung cancer group received microwave ablation combined with GP chemotherapy. Serum levels of IGF-1, IGFBP-7, HMGA2, and HMGB1 were compared between the control group and the lung cancer group before and after treatment. Based on prognosis, patients in the lung cancer group were divided into a good prognosis group and a poor prognosis group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors influencing prognosis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of serum IGF-1, IGFBP-7, HMGA2, and HMGB1 for the prognosis of microwave ablation combined with GP chemotherapy. Results Before treatment, the levels of IGF-1, HMGA2, and HMGB1 in the lung cancer group were higher than those in the control group, while the IGFBP-7 level was lower (P<0.05). Compared with pre-treatment levels, post-treatment levels of IGF-1, HMGB1, and HMGA2 in the lung cancer group decreased, while the IGFBP-7 level increased (P<0.05). After microwave ablation combined with GP chemotherapy, 58 patients had a good prognosis, and 24 patients had a poor prognosis. Compared with the poor prognosis group, the good prognosis group had lower serum levels of IGF-1 [ (336.86±8.46) μg/L vs (362.04±8.04) μg/L, t=12.437, P<0.01], HMGB1 [ (2.34±0.21) ng/mL vs (3.04±0.43) ng/mL, t=7.608, P<0.01], and HMGA2 [ (1.56±0.13) ng/L vs (2.38±0.98) ng/L, t=4.084, P< 0.01] and a higher serum level of IGFBP-7 [ (36.82 ± 3.77) ng/L vs (25.37 ± 4.15) ng/L, t=12.149, P<0.01]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high serum levels of IGF- 1, HMGA2, and HMGB1 and a low serum level of IGFBP-7 were independent risk factors for the prognosis of microwave ablation combined with GP chemotherapy (P<0.05). The areas under the curve (AUC) of serum IGF-1, IGFBP-7, HMGA2 and HMGB1 in predicting the prognosis of microwave ablation combined with GP chemotherapy were 0.883, 0.801, 0.865 and 0.875, respectively, and the AUC of combined detection was the largest, which was 0.974. Conclusion Serum levels of IGF-1, IGFBP-7, HMGA2, and HMGB1 can be served as effective biomarkers for prognostic assessment in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with microwave ablation combined with GP chemotherapy.
keywords: Microwave ablation Chemotherapy Non-small cell lung cancer Insulin-like growth factor-1 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-7 High mobility group protein A2 High mobility group protein B1
文章编号: 中图分类号:R734.2 文献标志码:A
基金项目:河北省医学科学研究课题计划(20251493)
附件
| 作者 | 单位 |
| 刘海燕 | 沧州市人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河北 沧州 061000 |
| 宋健 | 沧州市人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河北 沧州 061000 |
| 陈晓琳 | 沧州市人民医院内科,河北 沧州 061000 |
| 宋苗苗 | 沧州市人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河北 沧州 061000 |
| 王晖 | 沧州市人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河北 沧州 061000 |
| 徐锋 | 沧州市人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河北 沧州 061000 |
引用文本:
刘海燕,宋健,陈晓琳,等.四种血清标志物预测微波消融联合吉西他滨+顺铂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者预后[J].中国临床研究,2025,38(12):1887-1892.
刘海燕,宋健,陈晓琳,等.四种血清标志物预测微波消融联合吉西他滨+顺铂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者预后[J].中国临床研究,2025,38(12):1887-1892.
