###
中国临床研究:2025,38(12):1803-1806
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
超声引导下不同入路收肌管阻滞在全膝关节置换术后镇痛中的研究进展
(1.武汉科技大学荆门市中心医院研究生联合培养基地 荆门市中心医院麻醉科, 湖北 荆门 438000;2.武汉科技大学医学部医学院, 湖北 武汉 430065)
Advance in ultrasound-guided adductor canal block with different approaches for postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty
(1.Department of Anesthesiology, Joint Postgraduate Training Base of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Jingmen Central Hospital, Jingmen, Hubei 438000, China;2.School of Medicine in Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430065, China)
摘要
本文已被:浏览 167次   下载 83
投稿时间:2025-06-12   网络发布日期:2025-12-25
中文摘要: 全膝关节置换术(TKA)后疼痛管理是影响患者康复质量的关键因素。约80%的患者术后会经历中重度急性疼痛,其 中 30%可能发展为慢性疼痛。传统股神经阻滞虽能有效镇痛,但会导致股四头肌肌力减弱,影响早期康复。收肌管阻滞(ACB)作为新兴的区域阻滞技术,在保留运动功能的同时可提供良好的镇痛作用,但其最佳入路选择仍存在争议。本文综 述了近年来超声引导下 ACB 不同入路的安全性及有效性,比较其对 TKA 术后疼痛控制和早期运动功能的影响,旨在为临床实践提供参考。
Abstract:Pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is pivotal for optimizing patient recovery. Approximately 80% of patients experience moderate-to-severe acute postoperative pain, with 30% progressing to chronic pain. While the traditional femoral nerve block provides effective analgesia, it compromises quadriceps muscle strength, thereby impeding early rehabilitation. The adductor canal block (ACB), an emerging regional analgesic technique, can offer favorable pain relief while preserving motor function, though debate persists regarding its optimal approach. This review evaluates the safety and efficacy of distinct ACB approaches, focusing on their impacts on postoperative pain control and early functional recovery, aims to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical decision-making in TKA pain management.
文章编号:     中图分类号:R614.4    文献标志码:A
基金项目:
附件
引用文本:
刘倩,杨昌明.超声引导下不同入路收肌管阻滞在全膝关节置换术后镇痛中的研究进展[J].中国临床研究,2025,38(12):1803-1806.

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫