本文已被:浏览 328次 下载 163次
投稿时间:2025-02-18 网络发布日期:2025-08-20
投稿时间:2025-02-18 网络发布日期:2025-08-20
中文摘要: 目的 比较超声引导下神经阻滞与戳孔局部浸润镇痛对腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)患者镇痛效果及应激指标水平的影响,以期为临床选择更合适的术后镇痛方法提供理论依据。方法 前瞻性选取2020年1月至2024年11月安徽医科大学附属安庆第一人民医院收治的76例择期行LC的患者,采用随机信封法分为A组(麻醉诱导后采用超声引导下神经阻滞进行镇痛,n=38)和 B 组(术毕采用戳孔局部浸润镇痛,n=38)。比较两组患者术后相关指标、疼痛情况[视觉模拟评分(VAS)]、应激反应指标[血浆肾上腺素(E)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)、皮质醇(Cor)]和不良反应发生情况。结果 A 组术后清醒时间短于 B 组[(12.26±2.17)min vs(20.08±3.34)min,P<0.05],追加镇痛药物剂量和追加频次均少于 B 组(P<0.05);A 组术后清醒时,术后 6 h、12 h、24 h 时的切口VAS评分和非切口VAS评分均低于B组(P<0.05);术后6 h,两组患者的E、NE、Cor水平升高,但A组均低于B组(P<0.05);A组和B组患者不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(10.53% vs 7.89%,P>0.05)。结论 相较于戳孔局部浸润镇痛,超声引导下神经阻滞用于LC患者镇痛效果好,可有效缩短患者术后清醒时间,减少术后镇痛药物的使用剂量和频次,减轻术后疼痛程度,同时还能降低应激反应,且不会加重不良反应。
Abstract:Objective To compare the influence of ultrasound- guided nerve block and local infiltration analgesia on analgesic effect and levels of stress markers in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC),and to establish a theoretical foundation for optimizing clinical selection of postoperative pain management approaches. Methods A total of 76 patients undergoing elective LC in Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2020 to November 2024 were selected prospectively and divided into group A(ultrasound-guided nerve block analgesia after anesthesia induction,n=38)and group B(local infiltration analgesia after the end of surgery,n=38)by random envelope method. The postoperative indicators,pain status[visual analogue scale(VAS)],stress response indicators[plasma epinephrine(E),norepinephrine(NE),cortisol(Cor)]and occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between two groups. Results The postoperative awakening time in group A was shorter than that in group B[(12.26±2.17)min vs(20.08±3.34)min,P<0.05],and the dosage and frequency of additional analgesic drugs were lower than those in group B(P<0.05). Incision VAS score and non-incision VAS score in group A were lower than those in group B at postoperative awakening and at 6,12 and 24 hours after surgery(P<0.05). At 6 hours after surgery,the levels of E,NE and Cor in the two groups were increased,but the levels in group A were lower than those in group B(P<0.05). The adverse reactions revealed no statistical differences between group A and group B(10.53% vs 7.89% ,P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with local infiltration analgesia,ultrasound-guided nerve block has a better analgesic effect on LC patients,and the latter one can shorten the postoperative awakening time more effectively,reduce the dosage and frequency of postoperative analgesic drugs,relieve the degree of postoperative pain,and reduce the stress response without aggravating adverse reactions.
keywords: Ultrasonic guidance Nerve block Local infiltration analgesia Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Analgesic effect Stress response
文章编号: 中图分类号:R614 文献标志码:A
基金项目:皖南医学院校级科研项目(JXYY202114)
附件
| Author Name | Affiliation |
| LIAO Yongfeng,WANG Hui,ZHANG Yuedong | Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Anqing,Anhui 246200,China |
引用文本:
廖永锋,王辉,张跃东.超声引导下神经阻滞与戳孔局部浸润镇痛对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者镇痛效果的比较[J].中国临床研究,2025,38(8):1232-1236.
廖永锋,王辉,张跃东.超声引导下神经阻滞与戳孔局部浸润镇痛对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者镇痛效果的比较[J].中国临床研究,2025,38(8):1232-1236.
