###
中国临床研究:2021,34(4):433-437
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
不同血运重建策略对冠状动脉三支血管病变患者预后影响的对比
(安徽医科大学附属省立医院心脏大血管外科,安徽 合肥 230001)
Efficacy comparison of different revascularization strategies on the prognosis of patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease
(Department of Cardiac Surgery,Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University,Hefei,Anhui 230001,China)
摘要
本文已被:浏览 718次   下载 507
投稿时间:2020-10-10   网络发布日期:2021-04-20
中文摘要: 目的 比较不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(DES-PCI)对冠状动脉三支血管病变(TVD)患者中远期预后的影响。方法 回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年6月安徽医科大学附属省立医院首次接受血运重建的TVD患者的临床资料,依据不同的血运重建方式分为DES-PCI组和OPCAB组,随访2年,观察患者术后全因死亡、再次血运重建、非致死性心肌梗死、脑卒中以及主要心脑血管事件(MACCE)事件发生情况。结果 共有688例TVD患者被纳入,其中DES-PCI组435例,OPCAB组253例。随访1年,与OPCAB组相比,DES-PCI组再次血运重建率升高(3.68% vs 0.40%,P<0.01)。随访2年,与OPCAB组相比,DES-PCI组再次血运重建率(11.72% vs 1.58%,P<0.01)、非致死性心肌梗死率(4.14% vs 1.19%,P<0.05)及MACCE事件发生率(22.30% vs 13.83%,P<0.01)升高;而脑卒中发生率(2.07% vs 4.74%,P<0.05)降低。DES-PCI组和OPCAB组全因死亡率差异无统计学意义(1.61% vs 3.16%,P>0.05)。结论 对于TVD患者,OPCAB在减少再次血运重建、非致死性心肌梗死及MACCE方面优于DES-PCI,但OPCAB组的脑卒中发生率较高,仍需要更长期的随访研究。
Abstract:Objective To compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting stent implantation(DES-PCI) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting(OPCAB) for coronary artery disease patients with three-vessel disease(TVD). Methods A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with TVD undergoing DES-PCI or OPCAB between January 2017 and June 2018 was carried out.According to different revascularization methods,they were divided into DES-PCI group and OPCAB group.The patients were followed up for 2 years to observe the incidence of all-cause death,revascularization,non fatal myocardial infarction(MI),stroke and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Results A total of 688 patients were identified:435 cases of DES-PCI and 253 cases of OPCAB.Compared with OPCAB group after 1-year follow-up,the rate of revascularization increased in DES-PCI group (3.68% vs 0.40%,P<0.01).Compare with OPCAB group during 2-year follow-up,there were significant rise in the repeat revascularization rate(11.72% vs 1.58%,P<0.01),the non-fatal MI rate(4.14% vs 1.19%,P<0.05) and the incidence rate of MACCE(22.30% vs 13.83%,P<0.01),but significant reduction in stroke rate(2.07% vs 4.74%,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the two groups(1.61% vs 3.16%,P>0.05). Conclusions For TVD patients,OPCAB is superior to DES-PCI in reducing revascularization,non fatal MI and MACCE.However,the incidence of stroke in OPCAB group is higher,which still meeds a longer-term follow-up study.
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:A
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(NSFC81470530);安徽省科技重大专项(18030801132);安徽省自然科学基金面上项目(2008085MH240)
引用文本:
刘坦,葛建军.不同血运重建策略对冠状动脉三支血管病变患者预后影响的对比[J].中国临床研究,2021,34(4):433-437.

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫